Re: [PATCH V10 10/22] LoongArch: Add exception/interrupt handling

From: WANG Xuerui
Date: Sun May 15 2022 - 05:07:21 EST


Hi,

On 5/14/22 16:03, Huacai Chen wrote:
Add the exception and interrupt handling machanism for basic LoongArch
support.

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/loongarch/include/asm/branch.h | 21 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/bug.h | 23 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/entry-common.h | 13 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/hardirq.h | 24 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 17 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/irq.h | 130 ++++
arch/loongarch/include/asm/irq_regs.h | 27 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/irqflags.h | 78 +++
arch/loongarch/include/asm/kdebug.h | 23 +
arch/loongarch/include/asm/stackframe.h | 212 ++++++
arch/loongarch/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 74 +++
arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h | 23 +
arch/loongarch/kernel/access-helper.h | 13 +
arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S | 95 +++
arch/loongarch/kernel/irq.c | 131 ++++
arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c | 755 ++++++++++++++++++++++
16 files changed, 1659 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/branch.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/bug.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/entry-common.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/hardirq.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/hw_irq.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/irq.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/irq_regs.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/irqflags.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/kdebug.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/stackframe.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/stacktrace.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/access-helper.h
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/genex.S
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/irq.c
create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
This patch mostly looks good, except...
(snip)

+asmlinkage void cache_parity_error(void)
+{
+ const int field = 2 * sizeof(unsigned long);
+ unsigned int reg_val;
+
+ /* For the moment, report the problem and hang. */
+ pr_err("Cache error exception:\n");
+ pr_err("csr_merrera == %0*llx\n", field, csr_readq(LOONGARCH_CSR_MERRERA));
+ reg_val = csr_readl(LOONGARCH_CSR_MERRCTL);
+ pr_err("csr_merrctl == %08x\n", reg_val);
+
+ pr_err("Decoded c0_cacheerr: %s cache fault in %s reference.\n",
+ reg_val & (1<<30) ? "secondary" : "primary",
+ reg_val & (1<<31) ? "data" : "insn");
+ if (((current_cpu_data.processor_id & 0xff0000) == PRID_COMP_LOONGSON)) {
+ pr_err("Error bits: %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
+ reg_val & (1<<29) ? "ED " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<28) ? "ET " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<27) ? "ES " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<26) ? "EE " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<25) ? "EB " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<24) ? "EI " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<23) ? "E1 " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<22) ? "E0 " : "");
+ } else {
+ pr_err("Error bits: %s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
+ reg_val & (1<<29) ? "ED " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<28) ? "ET " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<26) ? "EE " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<25) ? "EB " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<24) ? "EI " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<23) ? "E1 " : "",
+ reg_val & (1<<22) ? "E0 " : "");
+ }
+ pr_err("IDX: 0x%08x\n", reg_val & ((1<<22)-1));
+
+ panic("Can't handle the cache error!");
+}

... this function. This implementation is completely wrong, as it's the same logic on MIPS, but LoongArch's MERRCTL CSR is not arranged in the same way. There are no individual error bits, for example.

You can simply replace this with a direct panic for now, for correctness.

With this fixed:

Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xxxxxxxxxx>