Re: [RFC v2 1/2] clk: hisilicon: add CRG driver Hi3521a SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/06/2022 13:06, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/06/2022 12:58, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 01/05/2022 19:34, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>>>>> Add CRG driver for Hi3521A SoC. CRG (Clock and Reset Generator) module
>>>>> generates clock and reset signals used by other module blocks on SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/Kconfig             |   8 ++
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/Makefile            |   1 +
>>>>>  drivers/clk/hisilicon/crg-hi3521a.c       | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3521a-clock.h |  34 ++++++
>>>>
>>>> Bindings go to separate patch. Your patchset is unmerge'able.
>>>>
>>> So, assuming I have the following patches:
>>> 1: +include/dt-bindings/clock/hi3521a-clock.h
>>> 2: +drivers/clk/hisilicon/crg-hi3521a.c
>>> 3: +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/whatever
>>>
>>> In what order should they be applied?
>>
>> Applied or sent? The maintainer will apply them in proper order, this is
>> bisectable.
>>
>>
> Either or. Whatever makes the workload easier is what I'm looking for.

Sorry, you need to be more specific. Apply is not a job for you, for the
patch submitter.

Then you miss here important piece - which is the first patch. DTS goes
always via separate branch (or even tree) from driver changes. That's
why bindings are always separate first patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof