Hi, Marc,
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 8:52 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, will be removed.
On 2022-05-31 12:59, Huacai Chen wrote:
> We are preparing to add new Loongson (based on LoongArch, not
> compatible
> with old MIPS-based Loongson) support.
Please drop this blurb from all your patches. It adds zero information.
Sorry about the confusion; as suggested by you and Arnd, these two patches
> HTVEC will be shared by both old
> and new Loongson processors, so we adjust its description. HTPIC is
> only
> used by MIPS-based Loongson, so we add a MIPS dependency. PCH_PIC and
> PCH_MSI will have some arch-specific code, so we remove the
> COMPILE_TEST
> dependency to avoid build warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
No cover letter, no indication of what this applies on, no mention
of how this relates to the ongoing irqchip review.
What do you want me to do with this?
are the minimal changes required on irqchip's side to make the port build,
without introducing any non-reviewed pieces of code. I originally wanted to
send the patches then quickly reply you in the asm-generic thread, but
unfortunately I lost Internet connectivity at my site until you have replied.
You are knowledgeable, and have taught me much; I owe you many thanks.
However, as my native language is not English, I realize I may sound impolite
or inappropriate from time to time, making some of you unhappy. (Actually I
had to ask Xuerui to translate this reply for me, in case I get something
wrong again.) I'll try to improve in the future and I hope you'll understand.