Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: backlight: rt4831: Add the new property for ocp level selection

From: Rob Herring
Date: Thu Jun 02 2022 - 09:56:10 EST


On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/05/2022 10:13, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年5月26日 週四 下午4:06寫道:
> >>
> >> On 26/05/2022 05:16, cy_huang wrote:
> >>> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Add the new property for ocp level selection.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../bindings/leds/backlight/richtek,rt4831-backlight.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> >>> include/dt-bindings/leds/rt4831-backlight.h | 5 +++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/richtek,rt4831-backlight.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/richtek,rt4831-backlight.yaml
> >>> index e0ac686..c1c59de 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/richtek,rt4831-backlight.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/richtek,rt4831-backlight.yaml
> >>> @@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ properties:
> >>> minimum: 0
> >>> maximum: 3
> >>>
> >>> + richtek,bled-ocp-sel:
> >>
> >> Skip "sel" as it is a shortcut of selection. Name instead:
> >> "richtek,backlight-ocp"
> >>
> > OK, if so, do I need to rename all properties from 'bled' to 'backlight' ?
> > If only this property is naming as 'backlight'. it may conflict with
> > the others like as "richtek,bled-ovp-sel".
>
> Ah, no, no need.
>
> >>
> >>> + description: |
> >>> + Backlight OCP level selection, currently support 0.9A/1.2A/1.5A/1.8A
> >>
> >> Could you explain here what is OCP (unfold the acronym)?
> > Yes. And the full name is 'over current protection'.
>
> Thanks and this leads to second thing - you encode register value
> instead of logical value. This must be a logical value in mA, so
> "richtek,bled-ocp-microamp".

We already have common properties for setting current of LEDs. We should
use that here I think.

Rob