Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/format-helper: Add KUnit tests for drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb332()

From: Javier Martinez Canillas
Date: Thu Jun 02 2022 - 12:27:14 EST


Hello José,

On 5/30/22 12:20, José Expósito wrote:
> Test the conversion from XRGB8888 to RGB332.
>
> What is tested?
>
> - Different values for the X in XRGB8888 to make sure it is ignored
> - Different clip values: Single pixel and full and partial buffer
> - Well know colors: White, black, red, green, blue, magenta, yellow
> and cyan
> - Other colors: Randomly picked
> - Destination pitch
>
> Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Thanks a lot for working on this! It's very cool to see the first KUnit
tests added to DRM :)

> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 12 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper_test.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper_test.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> index e88c497fa010..d92be6faef15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> @@ -76,6 +76,18 @@ config DRM_KMS_HELPER
> help
> CRTC helpers for KMS drivers.
>
> +config DRM_FORMAR_HELPER_TEST

I wonder if we want this level of detail for the test Kconfig symbols.
Maybe we could just have a DRM_KUNIT_TEST symbol that will enable all
the KUnit test suites for DRM ?

> + bool "drm_format_helper tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on DRM && KUNIT=y
> + select DRM_KMS_HELPER

Daniel didn't like this `select DRM_KMS_HELPER` and I think that we can avoid
it if instead drm_format_helper_test.c is included in drm_format_helper.c, i.e:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
index a3ccd8bc966f..d63e02da528f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c
@@ -692,3 +692,7 @@ void drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_mono(void *dst, unsigned int dst_pitch, const void *vadd
kfree(src32);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_mono);
+
+#ifdef DRM_KUNIT_TEST
+#include "drm_format_helper_test.c"
+#endif

This also has the advantage that will allow to have KUnit tests for the static
functions that are only available in the drm_format_helper.c compilation unit.

> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_SELFTEST) += selftests/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_FORMAR_HELPER_TEST) += drm_kms_helper.o \
> + drm_format_helper_test.o

And doing that will also allow you to get rid of this, since just selecting
CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST=y would be enough for the tests built and run by KUnit.

> +CFLAGS_drm_format_helper_test.o += $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
>

A comment on why this is needed would useful.

--
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat