[PATCH v11 12/19] KVM: s390: pv: refactoring of kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm

[Claudio Imbrenda]

Refactor kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm to improve readability and simplify the
improvements that are coming in subsequent patches.

No functional change intended.

[note: this can potentially be squashed into the next patch, I factored
it out to simplify the review process]

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index da1bae111fb1..a389555d62e7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -175,17 +175,17 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 	cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm),
 			   UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CONF, rc, rrc);
 	WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0);
-	if (!cc)
-		atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count);
-	KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
-	WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
-	/* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */
 	if (!cc) {
+		atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count);
 		kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm);
-		return 0;
+	} else {
+		/* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */
+		s390_replace_asce(kvm->arch.gmap);
 	}
-	s390_replace_asce(kvm->arch.gmap);
-	return -EIO;
+	KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
+	WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
+
+	return cc ? -EIO : 0;
 }
 
 static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
-- 
2.36.1