[PATCH 11/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_pages_first() and mmu_pages_next()

[Lai Jiangshan]

From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Use i = 0 andd i++ instead.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 +-------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 304a515bd073..7cfc4bc89f60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1886,19 +1886,7 @@ static bool is_obsolete_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 }
 
 #define for_each_sp(pvec, sp, i)					\
-		for (i = mmu_pages_first(&pvec);			\
-			i < pvec.nr && ({ sp = pvec.sp[i]; 1;});	\
-			i = mmu_pages_next(&pvec, i))
-
-static int mmu_pages_next(struct kvm_mmu_pages *pvec, int i)
-{
-	return i + 1;
-}
-
-static int mmu_pages_first(struct kvm_mmu_pages *pvec)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
+		for (i = 0; i < pvec.nr && ({ sp = pvec.sp[i]; 1;}); i++)
 
 static int mmu_sync_children(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     struct kvm_mmu_page *parent, bool can_yield)
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b