Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> The extern specifier is not needed for this declaration, so drop it. The
> function also depends only on the input parameters, and has no side
> effects, so it can be marked __pure like other functions in cpumask.h

Missed period.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 7ccddbc27ac3..f37ce00741a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
>  		(cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)),	\
>  		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
>  
> -extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
> +int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
>  
>  /**
>   * for_each_cpu_wrap - iterate over every cpu in a mask, starting at a specified location
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko