Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/4] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_register_rvdev function

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 05:54, Arnaud POULIQUEN
<arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Mathieu,
>
> On 6/1/22 19:41, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:54:44AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >> The rproc structure contains a list of registered rproc_vdev structure.
> >
> > This should be rproc_rvdev.
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
> I will send a new version according to your comments except
> this one.
> The structure name rproc_vdev is the good one, or
> or maybe I'm missing something?
>

You are correct - I had the name of the variable, i.e rvdev, found in
rproc_handle_vdev() in my head.  You can forget this comment.

> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> >
> >> To be able to move the management of the rproc_vdev structure in
> >> remoteproc_virtio.c (i.e rproc_rvdev_add_device and
> >> rproc_rvdev_remove_device functions), introduce the rproc_register_rvdev
> >> and rproc_unregister_rvdev functions.
> >
> > The name of those functions doesn't match the content of the patch.
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> >> index 3a469220ac73..081bea39daf4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> >> @@ -484,6 +484,18 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from)
> >>      return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static void rproc_add_rvdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> >> +{
> >> +    if (rvdev && rproc)
> >> +            list_add_tail(&rvdev->node, &rproc->rvdevs);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void rproc_remove_rvdev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> >> +{
> >> +    if (rvdev)
> >> +            list_del(&rvdev->node);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static struct rproc_vdev *
> >>  rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data)
> >>  {
> >> @@ -547,7 +559,7 @@ rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data)
> >>                      goto unwind_vring_allocations;
> >>      }
> >>
> >> -    list_add_tail(&rvdev->node, &rproc->rvdevs);
> >> +    rproc_add_rvdev(rproc, rvdev);
> >>
> >>      rvdev->subdev.start = rproc_vdev_do_start;
> >>      rvdev->subdev.stop = rproc_vdev_do_stop;
> >> @@ -576,7 +588,7 @@ static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> >> -    list_del(&rvdev->node);
> >> +    rproc_remove_rvdev(rvdev);
> >
> > With the above:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >>      device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>