Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: add vdosys1 RDMA definition for mt8195

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/06/2022 05:18, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: "Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add vdosys1 RDMA definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml   | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..678abb321cc2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,mdp-rdma.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek MDP RDMA
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  The MediaTek MDP RDMA stands for Read Direct Memory Access.
> +  It provides real time data to the back-end panel driver, such as DSI,
> +  DPI and DP_INTF.
> +  It contains one line buffer to store the sufficient pixel data.
> +  RDMA device node must be siblings to the central MMSYS_CONFIG node.
> +  For a description of the MMSYS_CONFIG binding, see
> +  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml for details.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdo1-rdma

During my review I missed that part. But your testing should not miss it
- please always run `make dt_bindings_check` and do not send code which
fails.

Best regards,
Krzysztof