[PATCH 5.18 295/879] libbpf: Dont error out on CO-RE relos for overriden weak subprogs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e89d57d938c8fa80c457982154ed6110804814fe ]

During BPF static linking, all the ELF relocations and .BTF.ext
information (including CO-RE relocations) are preserved for __weak
subprograms that were logically overriden by either previous weak
subprogram instance or by corresponding "strong" (non-weak) subprogram.
This is just how native user-space linkers work, nothing new.

But libbpf is over-zealous when processing CO-RE relocation to error out
when CO-RE relocation belonging to such eliminated weak subprogram is
encountered. Instead of erroring out on this expected situation, log
debug-level message and skip the relocation.

Fixes: db2b8b06423c ("libbpf: Support CO-RE relocations for multi-prog sections")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220408181425.2287230-2-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index dabf9a1451c3..7af6805a863d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -5665,10 +5665,17 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
 			insn_idx = rec->insn_off / BPF_INSN_SZ;
 			prog = find_prog_by_sec_insn(obj, sec_idx, insn_idx);
 			if (!prog) {
-				pr_warn("sec '%s': failed to find program at insn #%d for CO-RE offset relocation #%d\n",
-					sec_name, insn_idx, i);
-				err = -EINVAL;
-				goto out;
+				/* When __weak subprog is "overridden" by another instance
+				 * of the subprog from a different object file, linker still
+				 * appends all the .BTF.ext info that used to belong to that
+				 * eliminated subprogram.
+				 * This is similar to what x86-64 linker does for relocations.
+				 * So just ignore such relocations just like we ignore
+				 * subprog instructions when discovering subprograms.
+				 */
+				pr_debug("sec '%s': skipping CO-RE relocation #%d for insn #%d belonging to eliminated weak subprogram\n",
+					 sec_name, i, insn_idx);
+				continue;
 			}
 			/* no need to apply CO-RE relocation if the program is
 			 * not going to be loaded
-- 
2.35.1