Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] mm/demotion: Add support for removing node from demotion memory tiers

[Aneesh Kumar K V]

On 6/8/22 1:53 PM, Ying Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 13:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
> > On 6/8/22 12:29 PM, Ying Huang wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:12 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the special string "none" as a supported memtier value
> > > > that we can use to remove a specific node from being using as demotion target.
> > > >
> > > > For ex:
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat memtier
> > > > 1
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat ../../memtier/memtier1/nodelist
> > > > 1-3
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# echo none > memtier
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1#
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat memtier
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat ../../memtier/memtier1/nodelist
> > > > 2-3
> > > > :/sys/devices/system/node/node1#
> > >
> > > Do you have a practical use case for this?  What kind of memory node
> > > needs to be removed from memory tiers demotion/promotion?
> >
> > This came up in our internal discussion. It was mentioned that there is
> > a need to skip some slow memory nodes from participating in demotion.
>
> Again, can you provide a practical use case?  Why we shouldn't demote
> cold pages to these slow memory nodes?  How do we use these slow memory
> node?  These slow memory node is slower than disk?

This was discussed in the context of memory borrowed from remote machine 
(aka OpenCAPI memory). In such case, we would have a memory only NUMA 
node which we want to avoid using for demotion.

-aneesh