Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Add findconf script and helper program

From: Zev Weiss
Date: Thu Jun 09 2022 - 07:19:48 EST


On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:47:08PM PDT, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 12:49 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 6/8/22 20:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 07:48:44PM PDT, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Hi--
>>
>> On 6/8/22 02:54, Zev Weiss wrote:
>>> scripts/findconf provides menuconfig's search functionality as a
>>> standalone, non-interactive command, somewhat in the spirit of
>>> scripts/config. It is meant to be useful for tasks like getting a
>>> quick overview of symbol dependencies or determining which Kconfig
>>> file to edit for a given symbol, without having to fire up one of the
>>> interactive config programs.
>>>
>>> It accepts a single command-line flag, '-v', which causes it to also
>>> print the help text of each matching result.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> I can see how this could be useful.
>> It's a little easier to use than what I currently do:
>>
>> $ findconfig DRM_HISI_HIBMC
>> ./drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Kconfig:2:config DRM_HISI_HIBMC
>
> I'm guessing 'findconfig' here is some personal shell
> alias/function/script? (I can't see any references to it in the kernel
> source tree.)
>

Yes, it's just local.

>>
>> then $EDITOR that_Kconfig_file
>>
>>
>> In testing, I am seeing this:
>>
>> #
>> # using defaults found in /boot/config-5.3.18-150300.59.63-default
>> #
>> .config:421:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for I8K
>> .config:2335:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for
>> MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_HAMMING
>> .config:2484:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for PVPANIC
>> .config:8671:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for INTERCONNECT
>> .config:9369:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for
>> CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_BLAKE2S
>> .config:9370:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for
>> CRYPTO_LIB_BLAKE2S_GENERIC
>> .config:9653:warning: symbol value '1' invalid for KASAN_STACK
>>
>
> This I assume is just due to the contents of your .config file relative
> to the current Kconfig definitions and not a problem with anything in
> this patch?

There is no .config file in the linux/ source tree at the top level.
I use O=build_dir for all builds.

>
>> How do I specify/choose a .config file to be used?
>>
>> Oh, use KCONFIG_CONFIG=filename
>>
>
> Ah, I guess that'd be a nice thing to add a flag for to the wrapper
> script -- I'll include that in v2.
>
>>
>> Please update (add) usage/help text in scripts/kconfig/Makefile.
>>
>
> Ack, will do.
>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
>
> Zev
>








Another idea might be to add the following to
scripts/kconfig/Makefile:



@@ -77,7 +76,13 @@ PHONY += $(simple-targets)
$(simple-targets): $(obj)/conf
$(Q)$< $(silent) --$@ $(Kconfig)

-PHONY += savedefconfig defconfig
+PHONY += findconfig savedefconfig defconfig
+
+findconfig: $(obj)/conf
+ $(Q)$< $(silent) --$@=$(KCONFIG_FIND) $(Kconfig)
+
+%_findconfig: $(obj)/conf
+ $(Q)$< $(silent) --findconfig=$* $(Kconfig)

savedefconfig: $(obj)/conf
$(Q)$< $(silent) --$@=defconfig $(Kconfig)





Instead of adding a separate program for this,
you can modify scripts/kconfig/conf.c

- add 'findconfig' to enum input_mode
- add 'findconfig' to long_opts[]
- add 'case findconfig' to main() function



Then, you can do

$ make findconfig KCONFIG_FIND=DRM_HISI_HIBMC

or

$ make DRM_HISI_HIBMC_findconfig

as a shorthand.


scripts/findconf is unneeded
but you can put your own script in ~/bin
if you want to save your typing even more.


Hmm, interesting idea -- it seems a bit more awkward to use though, and if everyone who makes much use of it is likely to be writing their own little ad-hoc wrapper script anyway, it seems like we might as well do that once and check it in?

The current approach also provides support for multi-query searches, which while it isn't critical is slightly more convenient than running it multiple times or cramming everything into a single combined regex (analogous to grep's '-e' flag).

That said, if you and/or others have a strong preference for doing it via a make target I could rearrange it to work that way instead.


Thanks,
Zev