RE: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the proper places

[Hongxing Zhu]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2022年6月10日 0:26
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> festevam@xxxxxxxxx; francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the
> proper places
> 
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:20:16AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: 2022年6月9日 2:58
> > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> > > <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks
> > > to the proper places
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:47:08AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > > To make it more reasonable, move the phy_power_on/phy_init
> > > > callbacks to the proper places.
> > > > - move the phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable().
> > > > - move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset().
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what "make it more reasonable" is telling me.  In
> > > subject line and commit log, please say something more specific than
> > > "the proper places."
> > >
> > > It's probably more important to say where they are moving *to* than
> > > where they're moving *out of*.
> 
> > Thanks for your comments.
> > In another review loop listed below, Lucas used said that it's not
> > good to hide PHY init in imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() So, I make a
> > try to move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
> > And move phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable() accordingly.
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> >
> hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pci%2Fpatch%2F1646289275-17813-1-g
> i
> >
> t-send-email-hongxing.zhu%40nxp.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Chongxing
> .zhu
> > %40nxp.com%7C0094cb503bd64d9d8c0008da4a34bbc8%7C686ea1d3bc2b
> 4c6fa92cd9
> >
> 9c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637903887598125451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
> Zsb3d8eyJWIj
> >
> oiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C30
> 00%7C
> > %7C%7C&amp;sdata=ntbjAv6s3M0mUI8uCAUX23HiPNBlgvWKlAaw7lAh%2F
> pE%3D&amp;
> > reserved=0 Okay, I would specific that they are moving *to* later.
> >
> > > > In order to save power consumption, turn off the clocks and
> > > > regulators when the imx6_pcie_host_init() return error.
> > >
> > > Is the power savings the *reason* for this change?  I can't tell
> > > from the commit log.
> >
> > The error handling of the imx6_pcie_host_init() is not mentioned in
> > the subject.  Should I split these changes into two patches?
> 
> If they can be split, they probably should be split.
Got that, thanks a lot.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu