RE: [mkp-scsi:for-next 31/41] drivers/phy/samsung/phy-fsd-ufs.c:50:3: error: field designator 'cfgs' does not refer to any field in type 'const struct samsung_ufs_phy_drvdata'; did you mean 'cfg'?

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Martin

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 7:15 AM
>To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>; llvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kbuild-
>all@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Martin K. Petersen'
><martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Chanho Park'
><chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Bharat Uppal'
><bharat.uppal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 31/41] drivers/phy/samsung/phy-fsd-
>ufs.c:50:3: error: field designator 'cfgs' does not refer to any field in
type
>'const struct samsung_ufs_phy_drvdata'; did you mean 'cfg'?
>
>
>Alim,
>
>> I was expecting phy driver changes will go via phy tree, where [1] is
>> available.
>>
>> @Martin, can you please take a look?
>>
>> You can just take the ufs changes (along with its device tree) and
>> drop the phy change or take the [1] above.
>
>Doesn't matter to me, happy to drop the series again. I just queued it up
to
>see if there would be any warnings.
>
No need to drop entire series, as UFS changes has got all Reviewed-by tags.

Just drop patch-{1/6, 2/6 and 3/6} (phy changes)

And please keep patch-{4/6, 5/6 and 6/6} in your tree

Thanks 

>--
>Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering