From: Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>but let's not add dead code. and this patch is actually a right step
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 12:48 PM
On 2022/6/14 12:02, Tian, Kevin wrote:
It could be. I just wanted to maintain the integrity of Intel IOMMUFrom: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>why is it not part of the series for those use cases? There is no consumer
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 11:44 AM
This allows the upper layers to set a domain to a PASID of a device
if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware. The typical
use cases are, for example, kernel DMA with PASID and hardware
assisted mediated device drivers.
of added callbacks in this patch...
driver implementation.
simply from set_dev_pasid() p.o.v hence you should include in any
series which first tries to use that interface.