Re: [PATCH V4 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: add i.MX93 SRC

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:22:43PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: add i.MX93 SRC
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:50:54PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add bindings for i.MX93 System Reset Controller(SRC). SRC supports
> > > resets and power gating for mixes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/power/fsl,imx93-src.yaml         | 96
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/dt-bindings/power/fsl,imx93-power.h   | 11 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx93-src.yaml
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/fsl,imx93-power.h
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx93-src.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx93-src.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..880500a841f7
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx93-src.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id:
> > > +https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdevi
> > >
> > +cetree.org%2Fschemas%2Fpower%2Ffsl%2Cimx93-src.yaml%23&amp;data=0
> > 5%7C
> > >
> > +01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cbce11534c1f9456c1a4108da4e4e6d4d%7C6
> > 86ea1d3
> > >
> > +bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637908395997226535%7CUnkn
> > own%7CTWF
> > >
> > +pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
> > I6
> > >
> > +Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=sTDHZ9BVww%2FFe2pwS%2Fjoz
> > HPwWRmkU1hi
> > > +966eGXzjFSk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > +$schema:
> > > +https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdevi
> > >
> > +cetree.org%2Fmeta-schemas%2Fcore.yaml%23&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cpeng
> > .fan%
> > >
> > +40nxp.com%7Cbce11534c1f9456c1a4108da4e4e6d4d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> > fa92cd9
> > >
> > +9c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637908395997226535%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
> > Zsb3d8eyJWI
> > >
> > +joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3
> > 000%
> > >
> > +7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=xAU2zmsZDWOtCndpmKvMScG1XqjytSUnXLvzxR40p
> > HY%3D&amp
> > > +;reserved=0
> > > +
> > > +title: NXP i.MX93 System Reset Controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The System Reset Controller (SRC) is responsible for the generation
> > > +of
> > > +  all the system reset signals and boot argument latching.
> > > +
> > > +  Its main functions are as follows,
> > > +  - Deals with all global system reset sources from other modules,
> > > +    and generates global system reset.
> > > +  - Responsible for power gating of MIXs (Slices) and their memory
> > > +    low power control.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: fsl,imx93-src
> > > +      - const: syscon
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  slices:
> > 
> > power-controller
> > 
> > But if there aren't any other child nodes for the SRC, then why do you need this
> > level at all? If there are others, then your binding is incomplete.
> 
> Currently we not need other parts from driver, so I not add them. I just add mix
> slices with name "slices". For U-Boot, we are not using DTB for mem slices,
> so I not add mem slices.
> 
> It has following mix slices.

What's a mix slice?

> 0 EdgeLock Enclave
> 1 AONMIX
> 2 WAKEUPMIX
> 3 DDRMIX
> 4 DDRPHY
> 5 MLMIX
> 6 NICMIX
> 7 HSIOMIX
> 8 MEDIAMIX
> 9 CM33MIX
> 10 CA55 core 0
> 11 CA55 core 1
> 12 CA55 cluster
> 
> It has following mem slices:

What's a mem slice?

> 0 AONMIX memory
> 1 WAKEUPMIX memory
> 2 DDRMIX memory
> 3 DDRPHY memory
> 4 MLMIX memory
> 5 NICMIX memory
> 6 OCRAM
> 7 HSIOMIX memory
> 8 MEDIA memory
> 9 CA55 core 0 memory
> 10 CA55 core 1 memory
> 11 CA55 cluster memory
> 12 L3 cache
> 
> It has some general purpose functions that could
> be covered by SRC node itself.

Please make bindings as complete as possible, not what some u-boot or 
linux currently uses or not.

Rob