Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tegra: Fix clock DAI format on Tegra210
From: Charles Keepax
Date: Thu Jun 16 2022 - 06:31:48 EST
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:34:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> I2S reset failures are seen on Tegra210 and later platforms. This indicates
> absence of I2S bit clock, which is required to perform the reset operation.
> Following failures are seen with I2S based tests on Tegra210 and later:
>
> tegra210-i2s 2901100.i2s: timeout: failed to reset I2S for playback
> tegra210-i2s 2901100.i2s: ASoC: PRE_PMU: I2S2 RX event failed: -110
> tegra210-i2s 2901100.i2s: timeout: failed to reset I2S for capture
> tegra210-i2s 2901100.i2s: ASoC: PRE_PMU: I2S2 TX event failed: -110
>
> The commit d92ad6633fa7 ("ASoC: tegra: Update to use set_fmt_new callback")
> regressed I2S functionality on Tegra platforms. Basically it flipped clock
> provider and consumer DAI formats. This configures Tegra I2S in consumer
> mode by default now and there is none to provide bit clock during loopback
> tests. The external codec based tests also fail because both Tegra I2S and
> codec I2S get configured in consumer mode.
>
> ASoC core flips the DAI format before calling set_fmt() for CPU DAIs. This
> is negated in above commit. Fix this by swapping SND_SOC_DAIFMT_BC_FC and
> SND_SOC_DAIFMT_BP_FP switch cases.
>
> Fixes: d92ad6633fa7 ("ASoC: tegra: Update to use set_fmt_new callback")
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Ah.... I see what has happened there. As this device is one of
the few CPU side components defining non_legacy_dai_naming whilst
processing the DAI links the core would have been flipping the
format for this driver as it would have mistaken it for a CODEC
to CODEC link, so unlike the other CPU side components the flags
shouldn't have been inverted when I converted this driver.
Apologies for missing this whilst doing the updates, and thank
you for fixing. I will check if there are any other cases of this
that need to be hit.
A bit late but for what it is worth:
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Charles