[PATCH v1 07/11] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

[Andy Shevchenko]

The driver depends on ACPI (via MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT), ACPI_PTR() resolution
is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.

That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or
none should be used in a driver.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
index 6e4c2ca47d82..b48e620de7a3 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static struct platform_driver bxtwc_driver = {
 	.driver	= {
 		.name	= "BXTWC PMIC",
 		.pm     = pm_sleep_ptr(&bxtwc_pm_ops),
-		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bxtwc_acpi_ids),
+		.acpi_match_table = bxtwc_acpi_ids,
 		.dev_groups = bxtwc_groups,
 	},
 };
-- 
2.35.1