Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] drm/msm/dp: clean up pixel_rate from dp_ctrl.c
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Thu Jun 16 2022 - 16:07:44 EST
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-06-16 10:09:21)
> dp_ctrl keep an local cache of pixel_rate which increase confusing
> in regrading how pixel_rate being used. This patch refer pixel_rate
> directly from dp_panel to eliminate unnecessary pixel_rate variable
> from struct dp_ctrl.
>
> Changes in v8:
> -- add this patch to remove pixel_rate from dp_ctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I can send a proper patch for this myself later.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> index 01028b5..6fddddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> @@ -1528,36 +1526,6 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_maintenance(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int dp_ctrl_process_phy_test_request(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> -{
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - if (!ctrl->link->phy_params.phy_test_pattern_sel) {
> - drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev,
> - "no test pattern selected by sink\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * The global reset will need DP link related clocks to be
> - * running. Add the global reset just before disabling the
> - * link clocks and core clocks.
> - */
> - ret = dp_ctrl_off(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> - if (ret) {
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to disable DP controller\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - ret = dp_ctrl_on_link(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> - else
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to enable DP link controller\n");
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static bool dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> {
> bool success = false;
> @@ -1610,6 +1578,56 @@ static bool dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> return success;
> }
>
> +int dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
> + unsigned long pixel_rate;
> +
> + ctrl = container_of(dp_ctrl, struct dp_ctrl_private, dp_ctrl);
> +
> + pixel_rate = ctrl->panel->dp_mode.drm_mode.clock;
> + ret = dp_ctrl_enable_stream_clocks(ctrl, pixel_rate);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to start pixel clocks. ret=%d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(ctrl);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dp_ctrl_process_phy_test_request(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!ctrl->link->phy_params.phy_test_pattern_sel) {
> + drm_dbg_dp(ctrl->drm_dev,
> + "no test pattern selected by sink\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The global reset will need DP link related clocks to be
> + * running. Add the global reset just before disabling the
> + * link clocks and core clocks.
> + */
> + ret = dp_ctrl_off(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to disable DP controller\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = dp_ctrl_on_link(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
> + else
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to enable DP link controller\n");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> void dp_ctrl_handle_sink_request(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> {
> struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
I'd prefer these hunks to be part of a different patch. Either squashed
into the previous patch, or after the previous patch to show that a
forward declaration isn't necessary, but helped minimize the diff of
that patch.
> @@ -1685,6 +1703,7 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_link(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> u32 const phy_cts_pixel_clk_khz = 148500;
> u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> unsigned int training_step;
> + unsigned long pixel_rate;
>
> if (!dp_ctrl)
> return -EINVAL;