Re: [PATCH] powerpc: powernv: Fix refcount leak bug in opal-powercap

From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Fri Jun 17 2022 - 01:01:41 EST


Le 17/06/2022 à 06:20, Liang He a écrit :
In opal_powercap_init(), of_find_compatible_node() will return
a node pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put()
in fail path or when it is not used anymore.

Besides, for_each_child_of_node() will automatically *inc* and *dec*
refcount during iteration. However, we should add the of_node_put()
if there is a break.

Hi,

I'm not sure that your patch is right here. Because of this *inc* and *dec* things, do we still need to of_node_put(powercap) once we have entered for_each_child_of_node?

I think that this reference will be released on the first iteration of the loop.


Maybe of_node_put(powercap) should be duplicated everywhere it is relevant and removed from the error handling path?
Or an additional reference should be taken before the loop?
Or adding a new label with "powercap = NULL" and branching there when needed?

CJ


Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-powercap.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-powercap.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-powercap.c
index 64506b46e77b..b102477d3f95 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-powercap.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-powercap.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void __init opal_powercap_init(void)
pcaps = kcalloc(of_get_child_count(powercap), sizeof(*pcaps),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pcaps)
- return;
+ goto out_powercap;
powercap_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("powercap", opal_kobj);
if (!powercap_kobj) {
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ void __init opal_powercap_init(void)
kfree(pcaps[i].pg.name);
}
kobject_put(powercap_kobj);
+ of_node_put(node);
out_pcaps:
kfree(pcaps);
+out_powercap:
+ of_node_put(powercap);
}