On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
Like for stm32mp15, when stm32 RCC node is used to interact with a secure
'st,stm32mp1' is stm32mp15?
context (using clock SCMI protocol), a different path has to be used for
yaml verification.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Rob, Krzysztof,
If you agree with this patch, I'll apply it directly in my STM32 tree.
Thanks
Alex
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
index f8c474227807..242fe922b035 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ if:
contains:
enum:
- st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure
+ - st,stm32mp13-rcc
You don't need '-secure' because it's always secure?
then:
properties:
clocks:
--
2.17.1