Re: [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' member of busy_tag_iter_fn

[John Garry]

On 17/06/2022 17:55, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > It's not totally necessary. Since local variable 'reserved' would now 
> > only be used once I thought it was better to get rid of it.
> >
> > I can keep it if you really think that is better.
>
> I'd prefer that these changes are either left out or that these are 
> moved into a separate patch. I think that will make this patch series 
> easier to review.

Personally I think that this is a trivial change and does not merit a 
separate patch. Other reviewers seem to agree. Anyway, if you feel 
strongly about this then I can put in another patch.

Thanks,
John