Re: [PATCH v1] staging: r8188eu: an incorrect return value made the function always return fail

[Larry Finger]

On 6/20/22 03:54, Kate Hsuan wrote:
> Since _SUCCESS (1) and _FAIL (0) are used to indicate the status of the
> functions. The previous commit 8ae7bf782eacad803f752c83a183393b0a67127b
> fixed and prevented dereferencing a NULL pointer through checking the
> return pointer. The NULL pointer check work properly but the return
> values (-ENOMEM on fail and 0 on success). This work fixed the return
> values to make sure the caller function will return the correct status.
>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097526
> Signed-off-by: Kate Hsuan <hpa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c | 8 +++-----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
> index f4e9f6102539..2f8720db21d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c
> @@ -180,10 +180,8 @@ s32	_rtw_init_xmit_priv(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
>   	pxmitpriv->free_xmit_extbuf_cnt = num_xmit_extbuf;
>   
>   	res = rtw_alloc_hwxmits(padapter);
> -	if (res) {
> -		res = _FAIL;
> +	if (res == _FAIL)
>   		goto exit;
> -	}
>   
>   	rtw_init_hwxmits(pxmitpriv->hwxmits, pxmitpriv->hwxmit_entry);
>   

This problem was fixed in mid May with commit 5b7419ae1d20 ("staging: r8188eu: 
fix rtw_alloc_hwxmits error detection for now"). The fix was

@@ -178,8 +178,7 @@ s32 _rtw_init_xmit_priv(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct 
adapter *padapter)

        pxmitpriv->free_xmit_extbuf_cnt = num_xmit_extbuf;

-       res = rtw_alloc_hwxmits(padapter);
-       if (res) {
+       if (rtw_alloc_hwxmits(padapter)) {
                res = _FAIL;
                goto exit;
        }

The "for now" part is that Phillip plans to get rid of _FAIL and _SUCCESS, and 
replace the logic with a normal 1 for fail, etc.; however, this will be a major 
change that must be done carefully.

In any case NACK for this patch.

Larry