Re: [syzbot] memory leak in setup_mq_sysctls

From: Alexey Gladkov
Date: Tue Jun 21 2022 - 18:41:52 EST

Next message: Zach O'Keefe: "Re: [mm-unstable v5 PATCH 0/7] Cleanup transhuge_xxx helpers"
Previous message: Michael Niewöhner: "Re: [PATCH v6 9/9] tpm, tpm_tis: Enable interrupt test"
In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [syzbot] memory leak in setup_mq_sysctls"
Next in thread: Dmitry Vyukov: "Re: [syzbot] memory leak in setup_mq_sysctls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:30:57AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 11:52:25PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot found the following issue on:
> >>
> >> HEAD commit: 979086f5e006 Merge tag 'fs.fixes.v5.19-rc3' of git://git.k..
> >> git tree: upstream
> >> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1284331bf00000
> >> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c696a83383a77f81
> >> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b4b0d1b35442afbf6fd2
> >> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> >> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=163e740ff00000
> >> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=132b758bf00000
> >>
> >> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> >> Reported-by: syzbot+b4b0d1b35442afbf6fd2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > I'm working on a fix that will remove this memory allocation entirely.
>
> Hmm. The memory should be freed when the corresponding namespace exits.
> I see retire_mq_sysctls is being called to free this memory. Alex do
> you see any leaks when you read that code?

I don't see a leak either. retire_mq_sysctls and retire_ipc_sysctls
functions are identical and are called one by one. I don't understand how
there can be an mq leak without an ipc leak. Unless it has something to do
with mq_init_ns (just guess).

> So it looks like either someone broke this in linux-next or there
> is a bug in the memory leak detector, or something truly strange
> like a memory stop is going on.

I will take a look.

> I don't see any changes to the ipc subdirectory since v5.19-rc1 in
> commit 979086f5e006 ("Merge tag 'fs.fixes.v5.19-rc3' of git://git.k.." )
> so the idea that the code is broken in linux-next is out.
>
> Which leaves the memory leak detector having trouble with this,
> or something like a memory stomp is causing problems.
>
> Catalin is it possible that the clever use of ctl_table_arg to hold the
> reference to the table before it is freed is confusing the memory leak
> detector? The idiom is old enough I don't expect so, but I have seen
> bugs lurk for a long time.
>
> Which leaves just a memory stomp or something even stranger in the code.
> syzkaller can you reproduce this on Linus's branch?
>
> Eric
>
> >> executing program
> >> BUG: memory leak
> >> unreferenced object 0xffff888112fc9200 (size 512):
> >> comm "syz-executor237", pid 3648, jiffies 4294970469 (age 12.270s)
> >> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >> ef d3 60 85 ff ff ff ff 0c 9b d2 12 81 88 ff ff ..`.............
> >> 04 00 00 00 a4 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> >> backtrace:
> >> [<ffffffff814b6eb3>] kmemdup+0x23/0x50 mm/util.c:129
> >> [<ffffffff82219a9b>] kmemdup include/linux/fortify-string.h:456 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff82219a9b>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x4b/0x1c0 ipc/mq_sysctl.c:89
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] create_ipc_ns ipc/namespace.c:63 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] copy_ipcs+0x292/0x390 ipc/namespace.c:91
> >> [<ffffffff8127de7c>] create_new_namespaces+0xdc/0x4f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:90
> >> [<ffffffff8127e89b>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x9b/0x120 kernel/nsproxy.c:226
> >> [<ffffffff8123f92e>] ksys_unshare+0x2fe/0x600 kernel/fork.c:3165
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3236 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3234 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __x64_sys_unshare+0x12/0x20 kernel/fork.c:3234
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> >> [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> >>
> >> BUG: memory leak
> >> unreferenced object 0xffff888112fd5f00 (size 256):
> >> comm "syz-executor237", pid 3648, jiffies 4294970469 (age 12.270s)
> >> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >> 00 92 fc 12 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................
> >> 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> >> backtrace:
> >> [<ffffffff816fea1b>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:605 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fea1b>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:733 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fea1b>] __register_sysctl_table+0x7b/0x7f0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:1344
> >> [<ffffffff82219b7a>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x12a/0x1c0 ipc/mq_sysctl.c:112
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] create_ipc_ns ipc/namespace.c:63 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] copy_ipcs+0x292/0x390 ipc/namespace.c:91
> >> [<ffffffff8127de7c>] create_new_namespaces+0xdc/0x4f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:90
> >> [<ffffffff8127e89b>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x9b/0x120 kernel/nsproxy.c:226
> >> [<ffffffff8123f92e>] ksys_unshare+0x2fe/0x600 kernel/fork.c:3165
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3236 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3234 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __x64_sys_unshare+0x12/0x20 kernel/fork.c:3234
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> >> [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> >>
> >> BUG: memory leak
> >> unreferenced object 0xffff888112fbba00 (size 256):
> >> comm "syz-executor237", pid 3648, jiffies 4294970469 (age 12.270s)
> >> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >> 78 ba fb 12 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 x...............
> >> 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> >> backtrace:
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:605 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:733 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] new_dir fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:978 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] get_subdir fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:1022 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] __register_sysctl_table+0x5a9/0x7f0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:1373
> >> [<ffffffff82219b7a>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x12a/0x1c0 ipc/mq_sysctl.c:112
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] create_ipc_ns ipc/namespace.c:63 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] copy_ipcs+0x292/0x390 ipc/namespace.c:91
> >> [<ffffffff8127de7c>] create_new_namespaces+0xdc/0x4f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:90
> >> [<ffffffff8127e89b>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x9b/0x120 kernel/nsproxy.c:226
> >> [<ffffffff8123f92e>] ksys_unshare+0x2fe/0x600 kernel/fork.c:3165
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3236 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3234 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __x64_sys_unshare+0x12/0x20 kernel/fork.c:3234
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> >> [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> >>
> >> BUG: memory leak
> >> unreferenced object 0xffff888112fbb900 (size 256):
> >> comm "syz-executor237", pid 3648, jiffies 4294970469 (age 12.270s)
> >> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >> 78 b9 fb 12 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 x...............
> >> 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> >> backtrace:
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:605 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:733 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] new_dir fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:978 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] get_subdir fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:1022 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff816fef49>] __register_sysctl_table+0x5a9/0x7f0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:1373
> >> [<ffffffff82219b7a>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x12a/0x1c0 ipc/mq_sysctl.c:112
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] create_ipc_ns ipc/namespace.c:63 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff822197f2>] copy_ipcs+0x292/0x390 ipc/namespace.c:91
> >> [<ffffffff8127de7c>] create_new_namespaces+0xdc/0x4f0 kernel/nsproxy.c:90
> >> [<ffffffff8127e89b>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x9b/0x120 kernel/nsproxy.c:226
> >> [<ffffffff8123f92e>] ksys_unshare+0x2fe/0x600 kernel/fork.c:3165
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __do_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3236 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __se_sys_unshare kernel/fork.c:3234 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff8123fc42>] __x64_sys_unshare+0x12/0x20 kernel/fork.c:3234
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> >> [<ffffffff845aab45>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> >> [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> >> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> >> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> >>
> >> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> >> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> >> syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
> >> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
> >>
>

--
Rgrds, legion

Next message: Zach O'Keefe: "Re: [mm-unstable v5 PATCH 0/7] Cleanup transhuge_xxx helpers"
Previous message: Michael Niewöhner: "Re: [PATCH v6 9/9] tpm, tpm_tis: Enable interrupt test"
In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [syzbot] memory leak in setup_mq_sysctls"
Next in thread: Dmitry Vyukov: "Re: [syzbot] memory leak in setup_mq_sysctls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]