答复: [PATCH] virtio_ring: remove unnecessary to_vvq call in virtqueue_disable_cb_packed

From: tomorrow Wang (王德明)
Date: Wed Jun 22 2022 - 20:22:12 EST


Hi,
The 35c51e093d956f6d058e193711c8d424817a44a9 patch has maked a similar
change

> Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: remove unnecessary to_vvq call in
> virtqueue_disable_cb_packed
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 03:50:52AM -0400, Deming Wang wrote:
> > It passes '_vq' to virtqueue_use_indirect(), which still calls to_vvq
> > to get 'vq', let's directly pass 'vq'. It can avoid unnecessary call
> > of to_vvq in hot path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I do not see the point of any of these patches. Sorry.
> If this is supposed to be an optimization, post some numbers pls.
>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 13a7348cedff..af2b7785ed77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -1475,10 +1475,8 @@ static void
> *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> > {
> > - struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > -
> > if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow !=
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> > vq->packed.event_flags_shadow =
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
> > vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
> > @@ -2007,7 +2005,7 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > return;
> >
> > if (vq->packed_ring)
> > - virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
> > + virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(vq);
> > else
> > virtqueue_disable_cb_split(_vq);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.27.0

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature