Re: [PATCH v2 3/4][next] scsi: megaraid_sas: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member in MR_DRV_RAID_MAP

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 03:45:33AM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 03:26:38PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 11:20:04PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > Replace one-element array with a flexible-array member in struct
> > > MR_DRV_RAID_MAP and use the flex_array_size() helper.
> > > 
> > > This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
> > > and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
> > > on memcpy().
> > > 
> > > Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
> > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
> > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
> > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I'd really like to see this fixed. :) I'm running into this 1-element
> > array problem now with UBSAN_BOUNDS:
> 
> Wow; another forgoten patch from the times we didn't have Patchwork. :) 
> 
> > 
> > [   10.011173] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-WLUive/linux-5.15.0/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:103:32
> > [   10.087824] index 1 is out of range for type 'MR_LD_SPAN_MAP [1]'
> > 
> > and I'm not the only one:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215943
> 
> It's actually great that other people are running into these issues now.
> That could only means that we should fixed ASAP. :)
> 
> We also have this other series that hasn't been applied yet:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/cover.1645513670.git.gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> > 
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >  - None.
> > > 
> > >  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c     | 6 +++---
> > >  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.h | 2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c
> > > index da1cad1ee123..9cb36ef96c2c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c
> > > @@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ static int MR_PopulateDrvRaidMap(struct megasas_instance *instance, u64 map_id)
> > >  					le32_to_cpu(desc_table->raid_map_desc_offset));
> > >  				memcpy(pDrvRaidMap->ldSpanMap,
> > >  				       fw_map_dyn->ld_span_map,
> > > -				       sizeof(struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP) *
> > > -				       le32_to_cpu(desc_table->raid_map_desc_elements));
> > > +				       flex_array_size(pDrvRaidMap, ldSpanMap,
> > > +				       le32_to_cpu(desc_table->raid_map_desc_elements)));
> > >  			break;
> > >  			default:
> > >  				dev_dbg(&instance->pdev->dev, "wrong number of desctableElements %d\n",
> > > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int MR_PopulateDrvRaidMap(struct megasas_instance *instance, u64 map_id)
> > >  			pDrvRaidMap->ldTgtIdToLd[i] =
> > >  				(u16)fw_map_ext->ldTgtIdToLd[i];
> > >  		memcpy(pDrvRaidMap->ldSpanMap, fw_map_ext->ldSpanMap,
> > > -		       sizeof(struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP) * ld_count);
> > > +		       flex_array_size(pDrvRaidMap, ldSpanMap, ld_count));
> > >  		memcpy(pDrvRaidMap->arMapInfo, fw_map_ext->arMapInfo,
> > >  		       sizeof(struct MR_ARRAY_INFO) * MAX_API_ARRAYS_EXT);
> > >  		memcpy(pDrvRaidMap->devHndlInfo, fw_map_ext->devHndlInfo,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.h b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.h
> > > index 9adb8b30f422..5fe2f7a6eebe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.h
> > > @@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ struct MR_DRV_RAID_MAP {
> > >  		devHndlInfo[MAX_RAIDMAP_PHYSICAL_DEVICES_DYN];
> > >  	u16 ldTgtIdToLd[MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_DYN];
> > >  	struct MR_ARRAY_INFO arMapInfo[MAX_API_ARRAYS_DYN];
> > > -	struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP      ldSpanMap[1];
> > > +	struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP      ldSpanMap[];
> > >  
> > >  };
> > >  
> > 
> > I think this patch is incomplete, and the wrapping struct needs to be
> > adjusted too:
> > 
> > @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ struct MR_DRV_RAID_MAP {
> >  struct MR_DRV_RAID_MAP_ALL {
> >  
> >         struct MR_DRV_RAID_MAP raidMap;
> > -       struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP ldSpanMap[MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_DYN - 1];
> > +       struct MR_LD_SPAN_MAP ldSpanMap[MAX_LOGICAL_DRIVES_DYN];
> >  } __packed;

BTW, I'd really like to get some input from the maintainers of this
code. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> >  
> > With that added, I get zero changes to the executable code.
> > 
> > I assume the others need adjustment too.
> 
> Interesting... OK, let me refresh my memory about the whole thing
> and be back in a minute.
> 
> --
> Gustavo