Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock tests: add VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG Makefile options

From: Mike Rapoport
Date: Thu Jun 23 2022 - 00:50:37 EST


On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:20:11PM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 08:30:36PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 04:29:05AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > > These patches add options VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG to Memblock
> > > simulator, which can be specified when running make. These patches also
> > > implement the functionality for these options.
> >
> > I seem to be missing patch 3/4 and I don't see it on lore?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/004e021cc3cb7be8749361b3b1cb324459b9cb9f.1655889641.git.remckee0@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Did it get sent? Did it define the ASSERT_*() macros?

I see it on lore in both linux-mm and linux-kernel, and here as well:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/39c5c97d2b5c1ab88b7bbbf02633f840fd5dfcdf.1655889641.git.remckee0@xxxxxxxxx/

> That's strange, my email shows that it was sent to linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx and
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx but I'm not seeing it on lore either.
> Should I resend just patch 3/4?

No need to resend.

> For now, you can take a look at v1. Patch 3 is unchanged from v1, which
> is showing up on lore:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fe34452209f54287023ccacd666eade81ecd9a24.1655878337.git.remckee0@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> It does not define the ASSERT_*() macros, that happens in patch 2.
> Patch 3 implements MEMBLOCK_DEBUG.
>
> Thanks,
> Rebecca
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.