Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: use the correct size for dma_set_encrypted()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 07:00:58AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> It looks like commit 4a37f3dd9a831 fixed a different issue?
> 
> Here my patch is for the latest mainline:
> 
> In dma_direct_alloc()'s error handling path, we pass 'size' to dma_set_encrypted():
>   out_encrypt_pages:
> 	  if (dma_set_encrypted(dev, page_address(page), size))
> 
> However, in dma_direct_free(), we pass ' 1 << page_order ' to dma_set_encrypted().
> I think the ' 1 << page_order' is incorrect and it should be 'size' as well?

Indeed.  I've applied the patch now.