[PATCH 4.9 150/264] hwrng: use rng source with best quality
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Jun 23 2022 - 12:58:43 EST
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 2bbb6983887fefc8026beab01198d30f47b7bd22 upstream.
This patch rewoks the hwrng to always use the
rng source with best entropy quality.
On registation and unregistration the hwrng now
tries to choose the best (= highest quality value)
rng source. The handling of the internal list
of registered rng sources is now always sorted
by quality and the top most rng chosen.
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
static struct hwrng *current_rng;
static struct task_struct *hwrng_fill;
+/* list of registered rngs, sorted decending by quality */
static LIST_HEAD(rng_list);
/* Protects rng_list and current_rng */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rng_mutex);
@@ -416,6 +417,7 @@ int hwrng_register(struct hwrng *rng)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
struct hwrng *old_rng, *tmp;
+ struct list_head *rng_list_ptr;
if (!rng->name || (!rng->data_read && !rng->read))
goto out;
@@ -431,14 +433,25 @@ int hwrng_register(struct hwrng *rng)
init_completion(&rng->cleanup_done);
complete(&rng->cleanup_done);
+ /* rng_list is sorted by decreasing quality */
+ list_for_each(rng_list_ptr, &rng_list) {
+ tmp = list_entry(rng_list_ptr, struct hwrng, list);
+ if (tmp->quality < rng->quality)
+ break;
+ }
+ list_add_tail(&rng->list, rng_list_ptr);
+
old_rng = current_rng;
err = 0;
- if (!old_rng) {
+ if (!old_rng || (rng->quality > old_rng->quality)) {
+ /*
+ * Set new rng as current as the new rng source
+ * provides better entropy quality.
+ */
err = set_current_rng(rng);
if (err)
goto out_unlock;
}
- list_add_tail(&rng->list, &rng_list);
if (old_rng && !rng->init) {
/*
@@ -465,12 +478,12 @@ void hwrng_unregister(struct hwrng *rng)
list_del(&rng->list);
if (current_rng == rng) {
drop_current_rng();
+ /* rng_list is sorted by quality, use the best (=first) one */
if (!list_empty(&rng_list)) {
- struct hwrng *tail;
-
- tail = list_entry(rng_list.prev, struct hwrng, list);
+ struct hwrng *new_rng;
- set_current_rng(tail);
+ new_rng = list_entry(rng_list.next, struct hwrng, list);
+ set_current_rng(new_rng);
}
}