Re: Linux 5.10.125
From: Greg Thelen
Date: Mon Jun 27 2022 - 01:42:22 EST
Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/26/22 6:04 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/26/22 4:56 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm announcing the release of the 5.10.125 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> All users of the 5.10 kernel series must upgrade.
>>>>
>>>> The updated 5.10.y git tree can be found at:
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-5.10.y
>>>> and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=summary
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>>
>>>> ------------
>>>>
>>>> Makefile | 2
>>>> arch/arm64/mm/cache.S | 2
>>>> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 2
>>>> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 34 ++++--------
>>>> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 11 +++-
>>>> fs/io_uring.c | 23 +++++---
>>>> fs/zonefs/super.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 31 ++++++++---
>>>> 8 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Christian Borntraeger (1):
>>>> s390/mm: use non-quiescing sske for KVM switch to keyed guest
>>>>
>>>> Damien Le Moal (1):
>>>> zonefs: fix zonefs_iomap_begin() for reads
>>>>
>>>> Eric Dumazet (1):
>>>> tcp: add some entropy in __inet_hash_connect()
>>>>
>>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman (1):
>>>> Linux 5.10.125
>>>>
>>>> Jens Axboe (1):
>>>> io_uring: add missing item types for various requests
>>>>
>>>> Lukas Wunner (1):
>>>> serial: core: Initialize rs485 RTS polarity already on probe
>>>>
>>>> Marian Postevca (1):
>>>> usb: gadget: u_ether: fix regression in setting fixed MAC address
>>>>
>>>> Will Deacon (1):
>>>> arm64: mm: Don't invalidate FROM_DEVICE buffers at start of DMA transfer
>>>>
>>>> Willy Tarreau (5):
>>>> tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset
>>>> tcp: add small random increments to the source port
>>>> tcp: dynamically allocate the perturb table used by source ports
>>>> tcp: increase source port perturb table to 2^16
>>>> tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation
>>>
>>> 5.10.125 commit df3f3bb5059d20ef094d6b2f0256c4bf4127a859 ("io_uring: add
>>> missing item types for various requests") causes panic when running
>>> test/iopoll.t from https://github.com/axboe/liburing commit
>>> dda4848a9911120a903bef6284fb88286f4464c9 (liburing-2.2).
>>>
>>> Here's a manually annotated panic message:
>>> [ 359.047161] list_del corruption, ffffa42098824f80->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
>>> [ 359.055393] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:47!
>>> [ 359.059786] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
>>> [ 359.065463] CPU: 11 PID: 15862 Comm: iopoll.t Tainted: G S I 5.10.124 #1
>>> [ 359.081804] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x49/0x80
>>> [ 359.086880] Code: c2 22 48 39 d1 74 25 48 8b 11 48 39 f2 75 2d 48 8b 50 08 48 39 f2 75 34 b0 01 5d c3 48 c7 c7 68 15 79 b1 31 c0 e8 c5 a2 5a 00 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 d8 8e 76 b1 31 c0 e8 b5 a2 5a 00 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 69
>>> [ 359.105431] RSP: 0018:ffffb6b66785bd58 EFLAGS: 00010046
>>> [ 359.110592] RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffffa42098824f00 RCX: d07284ea1fbba400
>>> [ 359.117642] RDX: ffffa43f7f4f05b8 RSI: ffffa43f7f4dff48 RDI: ffffa43f7f4dff48
>>> [ 359.124691] RBP: ffffb6b66785bd58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffb1f38540
>>> [ 359.131740] R10: 00000000ffff7fff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000282
>>> [ 359.138789] R13: ffffb6b66785beb8 R14: ffffa42095d33e00 R15: ffffa420937e3d20
>>> [ 359.145836] FS: 00000000004f8380(0000) GS:ffffa43f7f4c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> [ 359.153830] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> [ 359.159506] CR2: 0000000000539388 CR3: 000000027b57c006 CR4: 00000000003706e0
>>> [ 359.166552] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 359.173600] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>> [ 359.180647] Call Trace:
>>> [ 359.183064] io_dismantle_req+0x1da/0x2b0
>>> __list_del_entry [include/linux/list.h:132]
>>> list_del [include/linux/list.h:146]
>>> io_req_drop_files [fs/io_uring.c:5934]
>>> io_req_clean_work [fs/io_uring.c:1315]
>>> io_dismantle_req [fs/io_uring.c:1911]
>>> [ 359.187023] io_do_iopoll+0x4e5/0x790
>>> [ 359.194602] __se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x39b/0x6f0
>>> [ 359.208318] __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x29/0x30
>>> [ 359.212793] do_syscall_64+0x31/0x40
>>> [ 359.216324] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>
>> Well that sucks, I wonder why mine didn't fail like that. I'll see if I
>> can hit this and send a fix. Thanks for reporting!
>
> Below should do it, I apologize for that. I think my test box booted the
> previous kernel which is why it didn't hit it in my regression tests :-(
>
> Greg, can you add this to 5.10-stable? Verified it ran tests with the
> right kernel now...
>
>
> commit d2aaf8fdc544a3edf44820a07294d693dedd12e3
> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun Jun 26 18:16:17 2022 -0600
>
> io_uring: use separate list entry for iopoll requests
>
> A previous commit ended up enabling file tracking for iopoll requests,
> which conflicts with both of them using the same list entry for tracking.
> Add a separate list entry just for iopoll requests, avoid this issue.
>
> No upstream commit exists for this issue.
>
> Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: df3f3bb5059d ("io_uring: add missing item types for various requests")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Confirmed. This patch fixes the error I saw.
Tested-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 40ac37beca47..2e12dcbc7b0f 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,8 @@ struct io_kiocb {
> */
> struct list_head inflight_entry;
>
> + struct list_head iopoll_entry;
> +
> struct percpu_ref *fixed_file_refs;
> struct callback_head task_work;
> /* for polled requests, i.e. IORING_OP_POLL_ADD and async armed poll */
> @@ -2350,8 +2352,8 @@ static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
> struct io_kiocb *req;
>
> do {
> - req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, inflight_entry);
> - list_del(&req->inflight_entry);
> + req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, iopoll_entry);
> + list_del(&req->iopoll_entry);
> __io_complete_rw(req, -EAGAIN, 0, NULL);
> } while (!list_empty(again));
> }
> @@ -2373,14 +2375,14 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
> while (!list_empty(done)) {
> int cflags = 0;
>
> - req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, inflight_entry);
> + req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, iopoll_entry);
> if (READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) {
> req->result = 0;
> req->iopoll_completed = 0;
> - list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &again);
> + list_move_tail(&req->iopoll_entry, &again);
> continue;
> }
> - list_del(&req->inflight_entry);
> + list_del(&req->iopoll_entry);
>
> if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)
> cflags = io_put_rw_kbuf(req);
> @@ -2416,7 +2418,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
> spin = !ctx->poll_multi_file && *nr_events < min;
>
> ret = 0;
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ctx->iopoll_list, inflight_entry) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ctx->iopoll_list, iopoll_entry) {
> struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb;
>
> /*
> @@ -2425,7 +2427,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
> * and complete those lists first, if we have entries there.
> */
> if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed)) {
> - list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &done);
> + list_move_tail(&req->iopoll_entry, &done);
> continue;
> }
> if (!list_empty(&done))
> @@ -2437,7 +2439,7 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
>
> /* iopoll may have completed current req */
> if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
> - list_move_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &done);
> + list_move_tail(&req->iopoll_entry, &done);
>
> if (ret && spin)
> spin = false;
> @@ -2670,7 +2672,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req)
> struct io_kiocb *list_req;
>
> list_req = list_first_entry(&ctx->iopoll_list, struct io_kiocb,
> - inflight_entry);
> + iopoll_entry);
> if (list_req->file != req->file)
> ctx->poll_multi_file = true;
> }
> @@ -2680,9 +2682,9 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req)
> * it to the front so we find it first.
> */
> if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
> - list_add(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
> + list_add(&req->iopoll_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
> else
> - list_add_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
> + list_add_tail(&req->iopoll_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
>
> if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) &&
> wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sq_data->wait))