Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document Renesas RZ/Five SoC

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:22 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-27 13:27, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > Thank you for the review.
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 1:35 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 01:43:25 +0100,
> >> Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Document Renesas RZ/Five (R9A07G043) SoC.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> > v1->v2:
> >> > * Fixed binding doc
> >> > * Fixed review comments pointed by Krzysztof.
> >> >
> >> > RFC->v1:
> >> > * Fixed Review comments pointed by Geert and Rob
> >> > ---
> >> >  .../sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml                    | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
> >> >  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> >> > index 27092c6a86c4..59df367d1e44 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> >> > @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@ description:
> >> >
> >> >    While the PLIC supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts,
> >> >    interrupt handlers are oblivious to this distinction and therefore it is not
> >> > -  specified in the PLIC device-tree binding.
> >> > +  specified in the PLIC device-tree binding for SiFive PLIC (and similar PLIC's),
> >> > +  but for the Renesas RZ/Five Soc (AX45MP AndesCore) which has NCEPLIC100 we need
> >> > +  to specify the interrupt type as the flow for EDGE interrupts is different
> >> > +  compared to LEVEL interrupts.
> >> >
> >> >    While the RISC-V ISA doesn't specify a memory layout for the PLIC, the
> >> >    "sifive,plic-1.0.0" device is a concrete implementation of the PLIC that
> >> > @@ -57,6 +60,7 @@ properties:
> >> >            - enum:
> >> >                - allwinner,sun20i-d1-plic
> >> >            - const: thead,c900-plic
> >> > +      - const: renesas,r9a07g043-plic
> >>
> >> Since it is the NCEPLIC100 that is broken, shouldn't the compatible
> >> string actually reflect that? I'd rather see 'andes,nceplic100' once
> >> and for all instead of starting with Renesas, quickly followed by all
> >> the other licensees that will inevitably integrate the same IP (which
> >> isn't even specific to the AX45MP).
> >>
> >> This IP also comes with all sort of added (mis-)features, which may or
> >> may not be used in the future, and it would make sense to identify it
> >> specifically.
> >>
> > Agreed, I'll update it as above.
>
> Please synchronise with Samuel to have a common series that fixes
> both the Renesas and Thead platforms.
>
Yes Ive dropped an email to Samuel.

Cheers,
Prabhakar