Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] mfd: mt6370: Add Mediatek MT6370 support

[Lee Jones]

[...]

> > > > > +#define MT6370_IRQ_DSV_VPOS_OCP              124
> > > > > +#define MT6370_IRQ_DSV_BST_OCP               125
> > > > > +#define MT6370_IRQ_DSV_VNEG_SCP              126
> > > > > +#define MT6370_IRQ_DSV_VPOS_SCP              127
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct mt6370_info {
> > > > > +     struct i2c_client *i2c[MT6370_MAX_I2C];
> > > > > +     struct device *dev;
> > > > > +     struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > > +     struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > > > > +};
> > > >
> > > > Can we shove all of the above into a header file?
> > >
> > > Well... In Patch v1, we put these "#define IRQ" into
> > > "include/dt-bindings/mfd/mediatek,mt6370.h".
> > > But the reviewer of DT files hoped us to remove this header file, we
> > > put these "#define IRQ" in this .c file.
> > > Shall we leave them here or put them into the header file in
> > > "driver/power/supply/mt6370-charger.h"?
> >
> > Where are they used?
> 
> Sorry, I wrote the wrong path last time...
> What I should say last time was to put them into the header file into
> "driver/mfd/mt6370.h"
> These "#define IRQ" are just used in "driver/mfd/mt6370.c"
> I’m really sorry for making this mistake...

Yes, that would be fine.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog