Re: [PATCH 06/14] spi: dt-bindings: dw-apb-ssi: update spi-{r,t}x-bus-width for dwc-ssi
From: Conor.Dooley
Date: Mon Jun 27 2022 - 14:05:53 EST
On 27/06/2022 18:15, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:06:34PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On 20/06/2022 21:56, Serge Semin wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> snps,dwc-ssi-1.01a has a single user - the Canaan k210, which uses a
>>>> width of 4 for spi-{r,t}x-bus-width. Update the binding to reflect
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 48 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>>>> index e25d44c218f2..f2b9e3f062cd 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
>>>> @@ -135,19 +135,41 @@ properties:
>>>> of the designware controller, and the upper limit is also subject to
>>>> controller configuration.
>>>>
>>>> -patternProperties:
>>>> - "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>>> - type: object
>>>> - properties:
>>>> - reg:
>>>> - minimum: 0
>>>> - maximum: 3
>>>> -
>>>> - spi-rx-bus-width:
>>>> - const: 1
>>>> -
>>>> - spi-tx-bus-width:
>>>> - const: 1
>>>> +if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + contains:
>>>> + const: snps,dwc-ssi-1.01a
>>>> +
>>>> +then:
>>>> + patternProperties:
>>>> + "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>>> + type: object
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 3
>>>> +
>>>> + spi-rx-bus-width:
>>>> + const: 4
>>>> +
>>>> + spi-tx-bus-width:
>>>> + const: 4
>>>> +
>>>> +else:
>>>> + patternProperties:
>>>> + "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>>> + type: object
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 3
>>>> +
>>>> + spi-rx-bus-width:
>>>> + const: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + spi-tx-bus-width:
>>>> + const: 1
>>>
>>> You can just use a more relaxed constraint "enum: [1 2 4 8]" here
>>
>> 8 too? sure.
>
> Then no constraints needed because the common definition already has
> this presumably.
Almost, the default has 0 in the enum too.
I'll go with that - thanks!
Conor.