Re: [PATCH v5] coresight: etm4x: avoid build failure with unrolled loops

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Mon Jun 27 2022 - 17:44:41 EST


Hi Nick,

Thanks for the rework.

On 23/06/2022 18:41, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
When the following configs are enabled:
* CORESIGHT
* CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X
* UBSAN
* UBSAN_TRAP

Clang fails assemble the kernel with the error:
<instantiation>:1:7: error: expected constant expression in '.inst' directive
.inst (0xd5200000|((((2) << 19) | ((1) << 16) | (((((((((((0x160 + (i * 4))))) >> 2))) >> 7) & 0x7)) << 12) | ((((((((((0x160 + (i * 4))))) >> 2))) & 0xf)) << 8) | (((((((((((0x160 + (i * 4))))) >> 2))) >> 4) & 0x7)) << 5)))|(.L__reg_num_x8))
^
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c:702:4: note: while in
macro instantiation
etm4x_relaxed_read32(csa, TRCCNTVRn(i));
^
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:403:4: note: expanded from
macro 'etm4x_relaxed_read32'
read_etm4x_sysreg_offset((offset), false)))
^
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:383:12: note: expanded
from macro 'read_etm4x_sysreg_offset'
__val = read_etm4x_sysreg_const_offset((offset)); \
^
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:149:2: note: expanded from
macro 'read_etm4x_sysreg_const_offset'
READ_ETM4x_REG(ETM4x_OFFSET_TO_REG(offset))
^
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:144:2: note: expanded from
macro 'READ_ETM4x_REG'
read_sysreg_s(ETM4x_REG_NUM_TO_SYSREG((reg)))
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h:1108:15: note: expanded from macro
'read_sysreg_s'
asm volatile(__mrs_s("%0", r) : "=r" (__val)); \
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h:1074:2: note: expanded from macro '__mrs_s'
" mrs_s " v ", " __stringify(r) "\n" \
^

Consider the definitions of TRCSSCSRn and TRCCNTVRn:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:56
#define TRCCNTVRn(n) (0x160 + (n * 4))
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h:81
#define TRCSSCSRn(n) (0x2A0 + (n * 4))

Where the macro parameter is expanded to i; a loop induction variable
from etm4_disable_hw.

When any compiler can determine that loops may be unrolled, then the
__builtin_constant_p check in read_etm4x_sysreg_offset() defined in
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h may evaluate to true. This
can lead to the expression `(0x160 + (i * 4))` being passed to
read_etm4x_sysreg_const_offset. Via the trace above, this is passed
through READ_ETM4x_REG, read_sysreg_s, and finally to __mrs_s where it
is string-ified and used directly in inline asm.

Regardless of which compiler or compiler options determine whether a
loop can or can't be unrolled, which determines whether
__builtin_constant_p evaluates to true when passed an expression using a
loop induction variable, it is NEVER safe to allow the preprocessor to
construct inline asm like:
asm volatile (".inst (0x160 + (i * 4))" : "=r"(__val));
^ expected constant expression

Replace unsafe uses of calls to etm4x_relaxed_read32 with
csdev_access_relaxed_read32 when the parameter is an expression that
would be invalid inline asm so that it does not depend on the ability of
the compiler to optimize __builtin_constant_p of the expression to true.
Only when the second parameter of etm4x_relaxed_read32 expands to an
expression dependent on a loop induction variable do we need to fix
this.

For such cases where the induction variable is used in an expression,
perform the following function call replacements:
* etm4x_relaxed_write32 -> csdev_access_relaxed_write32
* etm4x_relaxed_write64 -> csdev_access_relaxed_write64
* etm4x_relaxed_read32 -> csdev_access_relaxed_read32
* etm4x_read32 -> csdev_access_read32
* etm4x_read64 -> csdev_access_read64

This is not a bug in clang; it's a potentially unsafe use of the macro
arguments in read_etm4x_sysreg_offset dependent on __builtin_constant_p.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1310
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>