Re: [PATCH V15 6/9] mfd: pm8008: Use i2c_new_dummy_device() API

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:

> 
> On 6/27/2022 1:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Lee,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 6/20/2022 4:37 PM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > > > On 6/20/2022 1:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On 6/17/2022 2:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2022, Satya Priya wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Use i2c_new_dummy_device() to register pm8008-regulator
> > > > > > > > client present at a different address space, instead of
> > > > > > > > defining a separate DT node. This avoids calling the probe
> > > > > > > > twice for the same chip, once for each client pm8008-infra
> > > > > > > > and pm8008-regulator.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > As a part of this define pm8008_regmap_init() to do regmap
> > > > > > > > init for both the clients and define pm8008_get_regmap() to
> > > > > > > > pass the regmap to the regulator driver.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > Changes in V15:
> > > > > > > >     - None.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Changes in V14:
> > > > > > > >     - None.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Changes in V13:
> > > > > > > >     - None.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c       | 34
> > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > > >     include/linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h |  9 +++++++++
> > > > > > > >     2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >     create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > index 569ffd50..55e2a8e 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/irq.h>
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > > > > > > > +#include <linux/mfd/qcom_pm8008.h>
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > > > >     #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > > > > > > > @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ enum {
> > > > > > > >     struct pm8008_data {
> > > > > > > >         struct device *dev;
> > > > > > > > +    struct regmap *regulators_regmap;
> > > > > > > >         int irq;
> > > > > > > >         struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > > > > > > >     };
> > > > > > > > @@ -150,6 +152,12 @@ static struct regmap_config
> > > > > > > > qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg = {
> > > > > > > >         .max_register    = 0xFFFF,
> > > > > > > >     };
> > > > > > > > +struct regmap *pm8008_get_regmap(const struct pm8008_data *chip)
> > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > +    return chip->regulators_regmap;
> > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm8008_get_regmap);
> > > > > > > Seems like abstraction for the sake of abstraction.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Why not do the dereference inside the regulator driver?
> > > > > > To derefer this in the regulator driver, we need to have the
> > > > > > pm8008_data
> > > > > > struct definition in the qcom_pm8008 header file.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think it doesn't look great to have only that structure in
> > > > > > header and all
> > > > > > other structs and enum in the mfd driver.
> > > > > Then why pass 'pm8008_data' at all?
> > > > 
> > > > There is one more option, instead of passing the pm8008_data, we could
> > > > pass the pdev->dev.parent and get the pm8008 chip data directly in the
> > > > pm8008_get_regmap() like below
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > struct regmap *pm8008_get_regmap(const struct device *dev)
> > > >   {
> > > >       const struct pm8008_data *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > 
> > > >       return chip->regulators_regmap;
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm8008_get_regmap);
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > By doing this we can avoid having declaration of pm8008_data also in the
> > > > header. Please let me know if this looks good.
> > > > 
> > > Could you please confirm on this?
> > > 
> > > > > What's preventing you from passing 'regmap'?
> > > > 
> > > > I didn't get what you meant here, could you please elaborate a bit?
> > Ah yes.  I authored you a patch, but became distracted. Here:
> > 
> > -----8<--------------------8<-------
> > 
> > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > mfd: pm8008: Remove driver data structure pm8008_data
> > Maintaining a local driver data structure that is never shared
> > outside of the core device is an unnecessary complexity.  Half of the
> > attributes were not used outside of a single function, one of which
> > was not used at all.  The remaining 2 are generic and can be passed
> > around as required.
> 
> 
> Okay, but we still need to store the regulators_regmap, which is required in
> the pm8008 regulator driver. Could we use a global variable for it?

Look down ...

> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> >   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > index c472d7f8103c4..4b8ff947762f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
> > @@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ enum {
> >   #define PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(paddr)	(paddr - PM8008_PERIPH_0_BASE)
> > -struct pm8008_data {
> > -	struct device *dev;
> > -	struct regmap *regmap;
> > -	int irq;
> > -	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > -};
> > -
> >   static unsigned int p0_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_0_BASE)};
> >   static unsigned int p1_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_1_BASE)};
> >   static unsigned int p2_offs[] = {PM8008_PERIPH_OFFSET(PM8008_PERIPH_2_BASE)};
> > @@ -150,7 +143,7 @@ static struct regmap_config qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg = {
> >   	.max_register	= 0xFFFF,
> >   };
> > -static int pm8008_init(struct pm8008_data *chip)
> > +static int pm8008_init(struct regmap *regmap)
> >   {
> >   	int rc;
> > @@ -160,34 +153,31 @@ static int pm8008_init(struct pm8008_data *chip)
> >   	 * This is required to enable the writing of TYPE registers in
> >   	 * regmap_irq_sync_unlock().
> >   	 */
> > -	rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > -			 (PM8008_TEMP_ALARM_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET),
> > -			 BIT(0));
> > +	rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_TEMP_ALARM_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> >   	if (rc)
> >   		return rc;
> >   	/* Do the same for GPIO1 and GPIO2 peripherals */
> > -	rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > -			 (PM8008_GPIO1_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > +	rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_GPIO1_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> >   	if (rc)
> >   		return rc;
> > -	rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap,
> > -			 (PM8008_GPIO2_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> > +	rc = regmap_write(regmap, (PM8008_GPIO2_ADDR | INT_SET_TYPE_OFFSET), BIT(0));
> >   	return rc;
> >   }
> > -static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> > +static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct device *dev,
> > +					struct regmap *regmap,
> >   					int client_irq)
> >   {
> >   	int rc, i;
> >   	struct regmap_irq_type *type;
> >   	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> > -	rc = pm8008_init(chip);
> > +	rc = pm8008_init(regmap);
> >   	if (rc) {
> > -		dev_err(chip->dev, "Init failed: %d\n", rc);
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Init failed: %d\n", rc);
> >   		return rc;
> >   	}
> > @@ -207,10 +197,10 @@ static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> >   				IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> >   	}
> > -	rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(chip->dev, chip->regmap, client_irq,
> > +	rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, regmap, client_irq,
> >   			IRQF_SHARED, 0, &pm8008_irq_chip, &irq_data);
> >   	if (rc) {
> > -		dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add IRQ chip: %d\n", rc);
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add IRQ chip: %d\n", rc);
> >   		return rc;
> >   	}
> > @@ -220,26 +210,23 @@ static int pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(struct pm8008_data *chip,
> >   static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >   {
> >   	int rc;
> > -	struct pm8008_data *chip;
> > -
> > -	chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!chip)
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	struct device *dev;
> > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > -	chip->dev = &client->dev;
> > -	chip->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg);
> > -	if (!chip->regmap)
> > +	dev = &client->dev;
> > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg);
> > +	if (!regmap)
> >   		return -ENODEV;
> > -	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
> > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);

Here ^

> > -	if (of_property_read_bool(chip->dev->of_node, "interrupt-controller")) {
> > -		rc = pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(chip, client->irq);
> > +	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "interrupt-controller")) {
> > +		rc = pm8008_probe_irq_peripherals(dev, regmap, client->irq);
> >   		if (rc)
> > -			dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to probe irq periphs: %d\n", rc);
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to probe irq periphs: %d\n", rc);
> >   	}
> > -	return devm_of_platform_populate(chip->dev);
> > +	return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> >   }
> >   static const struct of_device_id pm8008_match[] = {
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog