Re: [PATCH 22/31] soc/tegra: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()

[Dmitry Osipenko]

On 6/28/22 10:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-06-22, 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 27-06-22, 10:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 27.06.2022 09:45, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>>>> Looks okay. If you'll solve the cpufreq problem where OPP config is set
>>>>> by two drivers for the same cpu device
>>>> This is supported, there is some early freeing of resources on the
>>>> removal path though, the reasoning for which I already gave in another
>>>> email. Though, I am open to sorting that out as well, but nothing
>>>> breaks the code for now AFAICT.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In case of Tegra, we use tegra-cpufreq driver that sets supported_hw and
>>> registers cpufreq-dt. If cpufreq-dt driver defers the probe, then the
>>> supported_hw will be lost on the re-probe. I haven't checked yet, but I
>>> suppose that cpufreq-dt driver defers on Tegra30 because of the CPU
>>> regulator and that's why we get the "OPP table is missing" error.
>>
>> Aha, I get it now. I see, this is a real problem. Will fix it. Give me
>> some time to think. Thanks.
> 
> Okay, I fixed this in opp/linux-next, can you or Jon please give it a
> go on tegra30 to see if the issue is fixed ?
> 
> FWIW, I have fixed this with the IDR API and the OPP core will only
> free the resources in clear-config, that the corresponding set-config
> has configured. I have tested it with the clk API only though.
> 
> Once you confirm, I will resend all the patches and hope no issues are
> left here.
> 
> Thanks for helping out guys. Really appreciate it.
> 

The opp/linux-next works fine, thank you.

Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

BTW, the idr_alloc() is obsoleted by xa_alloc().

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry