Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] media: ov5693: rename ov5693_check_hwcfg into ov5693_get_hwcfg

[Jacopo Mondi]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Function ov5693_check_hwcfg don't only check the hw configuration but

s/don't/doesn't/ ?

> also get the hw configuration. Is better better to rename this into ov5693_get_hwcfg

The concept of "getting" the hw configuration vs "checking" it is
debatable. The function does many other things as far as I can tell.

However, this is also a little arbitrary but I guess it doesn't hurt ?

Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
  j

>
> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> index d5a934ace597..273caef467fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> @@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ static int ov5693_get_regulators(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
>  				       ov5693->supplies);
>  }
>
> -static int ov5693_check_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> +static int ov5693_get_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
>  {
>  	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(ov5693->dev);
>  	struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint bus_cfg = {
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	ov5693->client = client;
>  	ov5693->dev = &client->dev;
>
> -	ret = ov5693_check_hwcfg(ov5693);
> +	ret = ov5693_get_hwcfg(ov5693);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>