On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Hakan Jansson wrote:
Hi Rob,Okay, I guess this is fine in the same doc. Any conditionals to tighten
On 6/27/2022 7:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:06:25PM +0200, Hakan Jansson wrote:Yes, 'brcm,bt-pcm-int-params' is also applicable to CYW55572.
Hi Krzysztof,Including 'brcm,bt-pcm-int-params'?
Thanks for replying.
On 6/20/2022 2:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
CYW55572 is a new device from Infineon. It is not the same as any BroadcomCYW55572 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon.Patch is okay, but just to be sure - is it entirely different device
Extend the binding with its DT compatible.
Signed-off-by: Hakan Jansson <hakan.jansson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
index df59575840fe..71fe9b17f8f1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
- brcm,bcm43540-bt
- brcm,bcm4335a0
- brcm,bcm4349-bt
+ - infineon,cyw55572-bt
from Infineon or some variant of Broadcom block?
device.
Are all existingYes, all existing properties are applicable.
properties applicable to it as well?
I don't see a BT reset signalThat's correct, CYW55572 does not have a BT reset signal. Most of the
either, but maybe that's not pinned out in the AzureWave module which
was the only documentation details I could find[1].
existing listed compatible devices does not seem to have a BT reset signal
either so I think this is in line with the intention of the existing
document and driver implementation.
I think a separate doc will be better as it can be more precise as toI don't really see anything besides the optional BT reset property that
what's allowed or not. It's fine to reuse the same property names
though.
would be changed in a separate doc. As a separate doc would mean a
duplication of data that would need to be maintained in two more or less
identical docs, perhaps it would be better to modify the existing doc to
clarify for which compatible devices that the BT reset property applies?
(Which I believe are only these three: bcm20702a1, bcm4329-bt and
bcm4330-bt)
up the constraints would be welcome.
Rob