Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] media: ov5693: move hw cfg functions into ov5693_hwcfg
From: Jacopo Mondi
Date: Wed Jun 29 2022 - 12:08:11 EST
Hi Tommaso,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 05:29:31PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Move hw configuration functions into ov5693_hwcfg. This is done to
> separate the code that handle the hw cfg from probe in a clean way.
> Add also support to get clock from "clock-frequency" fwnode in
> ov5675_hwcfg function
Why ? :)
What about:
"Add support for ACPI-based platforms that specify the clock frequency by
using the "clock-frequency" property instead of specifying a clock
provider reference."
>
> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Not on this patch, but it seems you have not collected the tags
received on the previous version of the series.
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Fix commit body as suggested by Sakari, Jacopo
> - Add details to commit body as suggested Jacopo
> - Move ov5693_check_hwcfg into ov5693_hwcfg
> - Fix xvclk_rate position as suggested Jacopo
Also fixed a bug it seems :)
>
> drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> index d2adc5513a21..3c805a5a5181 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> @@ -1339,16 +1339,48 @@ static int ov5693_get_regulators(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> ov5693->supplies);
> }
>
> -static int ov5693_check_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> +static int ov5693_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> {
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(ov5693->dev);
> struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint bus_cfg = {
> .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY,
> };
> struct fwnode_handle *endpoint;
> + u32 xvclk_rate;
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> + ov5693->xvclk = devm_clk_get_optional(ov5693->dev, "xvclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(ov5693->xvclk))
> + return dev_err_probe(ov5693->dev, PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk),
> + "failed to get xvclk: %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk));
> +
> + if (ov5693->xvclk) {
> + xvclk_rate = clk_get_rate(ov5693->xvclk);
> + } else {
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "clock-frequency",
> + &xvclk_rate);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ov5693->dev, "can't get clock frequency");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
This now looks good to me, thanks!
> +
> + if (xvclk_rate != OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ)
> + dev_warn(ov5693->dev, "Found clk freq %u, expected %u\n",
> + xvclk_rate, OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ);
> +
> + ret = ov5693_configure_gpios(ov5693);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ov5693_get_regulators(ov5693);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(ov5693->dev, ret,
> + "Error fetching regulators\n");
> +
> endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, NULL);
> if (!endpoint)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Could be provided by cio2-bridge */
> @@ -1390,7 +1422,6 @@ static int ov5693_check_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct ov5693_device *ov5693;
> - u32 xvclk_rate;
> int ret = 0;
No need for ret to be intialized, but it was already like this...
The patch itself looks good
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
j
>
> ov5693 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ov5693), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1400,7 +1431,7 @@ static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> ov5693->client = client;
> ov5693->dev = &client->dev;
>
> - ret = ov5693_check_hwcfg(ov5693);
> + ret = ov5693_hwcfg(ov5693);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1408,26 +1439,6 @@ static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov5693->sd, client, &ov5693_ops);
>
> - ov5693->xvclk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "xvclk");
> - if (IS_ERR(ov5693->xvclk)) {
> - dev_err(&client->dev, "Error getting clock\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk);
> - }
> -
> - xvclk_rate = clk_get_rate(ov5693->xvclk);
> - if (xvclk_rate != OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ)
> - dev_warn(&client->dev, "Found clk freq %u, expected %u\n",
> - xvclk_rate, OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ);
> -
> - ret = ov5693_configure_gpios(ov5693);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = ov5693_get_regulators(ov5693);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> - "Error fetching regulators\n");
> -
> ov5693->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> ov5693->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> ov5693->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR;
> --
> 2.25.1
>