Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: st,stm32-i2c: don't mandate a reset line

[Wolfram Sang]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:41:15AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote:
> > Update the dt-bindings of the i2c-stm32 drivers to avoid the
> > needs for a reset property in the device-tree.
> 
> That is clear from the diff, but why. Some chips don't have a reset? 
> If so, this should be combined with patch 2 as part of changes needed 
> for a new version.

What do you mean? Patches 1+2 should be squashed together? I can do this
when applying. Or do you mean something else?

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> > index dccbb18b6dc0..8879144fbbfb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ required:
> >    - compatible
> >    - reg
> >    - interrupts
> > -  - resets
> >    - clocks
> >  
> >  unevaluatedProperties: false
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature