Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix a typo in comment

[Xinghui Li]

On 2022/6/29 22:46，“Jens Axboe”<axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>    On 6/29/22 8:43 AM, korantwork@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>    > From: Xinghui Li <korantli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>    > 
>    > fix a typo in comment in io_allocate_scq_urings.
>    > sane -> same.
>    > 
>    > Signed-off-by: Xinghui Li <korantli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>    > ---
>    >  fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
>    >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>    > 
>    > diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>    > index d3ee4fc532fa..af17adf3fa79 100644
>    > --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>    > +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>    > @@ -12284,7 +12284,7 @@ static __cold int io_allocate_scq_urings(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>    >  	struct io_rings *rings;
>    >  	size_t size, sq_array_offset;
>    >  
>    > -	/* make sure these are sane, as we already accounted them */
>    > +	/* make sure these are same, as we already accounted them */
>    >  	ctx->sq_entries = p->sq_entries;
>    >  	ctx->cq_entries = p->cq_entries;

>    That's not really a typo, though I can see why you'd think so. It's
>    trying to say that we need to ensure that the ctx entries are sane,
>    as they have already been accounted. This means that if we teardown
>    past this point, they need to be assigned (eg sane) so that we undo
>    that accounting appropriately.

Thanks a lot for your reply and I am sorry about wasting your effort. I will try to submit some valuable patches. : - )

-- 
Xinghui Li