Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] media: dt-bindings: ov5693: document YAML binding
From: Sakari Ailus
Date: Thu Jun 30 2022 - 05:50:13 EST
Hi Tommaso,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:12:47PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:07:19AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On 30/06/2022 09:45, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > > > Add documentation of device tree in YAML schema for the OV5693
> > > > > CMOS image sensor from Omnivision
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > How Sakari's tag appeared here? There was no email from him.
> > >
> > > Sakari made me some review on v2, but I think he forgot to add the mailing
> > > list in cc. ( I suppose :) )
> > >
> > > Let me know if I need to remove this.
> >
> > You're only supposed to put these tags into patches if you get them in
> > written form as part of the review, signalling acceptance of the patch in
> > various forms. Just commenting a patch does not imply this.
> >
> > Please also see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more
> > information on how to use the tags.
>
> Thanks for sharing this. My bad.
> I remove your tags.
The patches themselves seem fine. I'd just drop the 4th patch or at least
come up with a better name for ov5693_hwcfg() --- you're acquiring
resources there, and that generally fits well for probe. The code is fine
already.
--
Sakari Ailus