Re: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: update dts files for bcmbca SoC BCM63138

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05/07/2022 19:26, William Zhang wrote:
> Update compatible string and UART node and clock name based on device tree
> binding documents.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm63138.dtsi    | 18 +++++++++---------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm963138dvt.dts |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm63138.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm63138.dtsi
> index cca49a2e2d62..bec13ed9f73b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm63138.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm63138.dtsi
> @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
>  / {
>  	#address-cells = <1>;
>  	#size-cells = <1>;
> -	compatible = "brcm,bcm63138";
> -	model = "Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoC";
> +	compatible = "brcm,bcm63138", "brcm,bcmbca";

Changing compatibles affects ABI, so you should not combine it with some
node renaming/cleanup patch. Split these.

> +	model = "Broadcom BCM963138 Reference Board";
>  	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>  
>  	aliases {
> -		uart0 = &serial0;
> -		uart1 = &serial1;
> +		serial0 = &uart0;
> +		serial1 = &uart1;
>  	};
>  
>  	cpus {
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ sata_phy0: sata-phy@0 {
>  	};
>  
>  	/* Legacy UBUS base */
> -	ubus@fffe8000 {
> +	bus@fffe8000 {
>  		compatible = "simple-bus";
>  		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		#size-cells = <1>;
> @@ -185,21 +185,21 @@ timer: timer@80 {
>  			reg = <0x80 0x3c>;
>  		};
>  
> -		serial0: serial@600 {
> +		uart0: serial@600 {
>  			compatible = "brcm,bcm6345-uart";
>  			reg = <0x600 0x1b>;
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  			clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> -			clock-names = "periph";
> +			clock-names = "refclk";
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		serial1: serial@620 {
> +		uart1: serial@620 {
>  			compatible = "brcm,bcm6345-uart";
>  			reg = <0x620 0x1b>;
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  			clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> -			clock-names = "periph";
> +			clock-names = "refclk";

This is even more confusing. You now rename clock-names. How is this
related to board compatible or to node names?



Best regards,
Krzysztof