Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/tlb: ignore f->new_tlb_gen when zero

[Dave Hansen]

On 7/8/22 09:54, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Since the bug was not during MADV_DONTNEED there is no reason for the
> results to be any different.
> 
> Famous last words?

Considering that your patch broke the kernel a way that surprised us
all, I think caution is warranted.  Re-running a microbenchmark that
takes five minutes and stresses things a bit is the least you can do, I
think.