Re: [PATCH] dma: ti: k3-udma: Reset UDMA_CHAN_RT byte counters to prevent overflow

From: Péter Ujfalusi
Date: Sat Jul 09 2022 - 02:12:52 EST




On 7/4/22 14:13, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> UDMA_CHAN_RT_*BCNT_REG stores the real-time channel bytecount statistics.
> These registers are 32-bit hardware counters and the driver uses these
> counters to monitor the operational progress status for a channel, when
> transferring more than 4GB of data it was observed that these counters
> overflow and completion calculation of a operation gets affected and the
> transfer hangs indefinitely.
>
> This commit adds changes to decrease the byte count for every complete
> transaction so that these registers never overflow and the proper byte
> count statistics is maintained for ongoing transaction by the RT counters.
>
> Earlier uc->bcnt used to maintain a count of the completed bytes at driver
> side, since the RT counters maintain the statistics of current transaction
> now, the maintenance of uc->bcnt is not necessary.

Thanks for the patch,

> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> index 2f0d2c68c93c..0f91a3e47c19 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
> @@ -300,8 +300,6 @@ struct udma_chan {
>
> struct udma_tx_drain tx_drain;
>
> - u32 bcnt; /* number of bytes completed since the start of the channel */
> -
> /* Channel configuration parameters */
> struct udma_chan_config config;
>
> @@ -757,6 +755,22 @@ static void udma_reset_rings(struct udma_chan *uc)
> }
> }
>
> +static void udma_decrement_byte_counters(struct udma_chan *uc, u32 val)
> +{
> + if (uc->tchan) {
> + udma_tchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_BCNT_REG, val);
> + udma_tchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_SBCNT_REG, val);
> + if (!uc->bchan)
> + udma_tchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_PEER_BCNT_REG, val);
> + }
> +
> + if (uc->rchan) {
> + udma_rchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_BCNT_REG, val);
> + udma_rchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_SBCNT_REG, val);
> + udma_rchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_PEER_BCNT_REG, val);
> + }

In case of MEM_TO_MEM (or the not implemented DEV_TO_DEV) we use the
tchan's counter for position tracking, but we have the pair anyways (UDMA).
if ((uc->desc->dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
rchan bcnt reset
else
tchan bcnt reset

> +}
> +
> static void udma_reset_counters(struct udma_chan *uc)
> {
> u32 val;
> @@ -790,8 +804,6 @@ static void udma_reset_counters(struct udma_chan *uc)
> val = udma_rchanrt_read(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_PEER_BCNT_REG);
> udma_rchanrt_write(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_PEER_BCNT_REG, val);
> }
> -
> - uc->bcnt = 0;
> }
>
> static int udma_reset_chan(struct udma_chan *uc, bool hard)
> @@ -1115,8 +1127,8 @@ static void udma_check_tx_completion(struct work_struct *work)
> if (uc->desc) {
> struct udma_desc *d = uc->desc;
>
> - uc->bcnt += d->residue;
> udma_start(uc);
> + udma_decrement_byte_counters(uc, d->residue);

Why not before udma_start()?

> vchan_cookie_complete(&d->vd);
> break;
> }
> @@ -1168,8 +1180,8 @@ static irqreturn_t udma_ring_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> vchan_cyclic_callback(&d->vd);
> } else {
> if (udma_is_desc_really_done(uc, d)) {
> - uc->bcnt += d->residue;
> udma_start(uc);
> + udma_decrement_byte_counters(uc, d->residue);
> vchan_cookie_complete(&d->vd);
> } else {
> schedule_delayed_work(&uc->tx_drain.work,
> @@ -1204,7 +1216,7 @@ static irqreturn_t udma_udma_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> vchan_cyclic_callback(&d->vd);
> } else {
> /* TODO: figure out the real amount of data */
> - uc->bcnt += d->residue;
> + udma_decrement_byte_counters(uc, d->residue);
> udma_start(uc);
> vchan_cookie_complete(&d->vd);
> }
> @@ -3809,7 +3821,6 @@ static enum dma_status udma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> bcnt = udma_tchanrt_read(uc, UDMA_CHAN_RT_BCNT_REG);
> }
>
> - bcnt -= uc->bcnt;
> if (bcnt && !(bcnt % uc->desc->residue))
> residue = 0;
> else

--
Péter