Re: [PATCH 3/3] 9p: Add mempools for RPCs
From: Dominique Martinet
Date: Sat Jul 09 2022 - 16:50:59 EST
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 08:08:41PM +0200:
> Mmm, I "think" that wouldn't be something new. There is no guarantee that
> client would not get a late response delivery by server of a request that
> client has already thrown away.
No. Well, it shouldn't -- responding to tflush should guarantee that the
associated request is thrown away by the server
Order is not explicit, but I read this:
> If it recognizes oldtag as the tag of a pending transaction, it should
> abort any pending response and discard that tag.
late replies to the oldtag are no longer allowed once rflush has been
But I guess that also depends on the transport being sequential -- that
is the case for TCP but is it true for virtio as well? e.g. if a server
replies something and immediately replies rflush are we guaranteed
rflush is received second by the client?
There's also this bit:
> When the client sends a Tflush, it must wait to receive the
> corresponding Rflush before reusing oldtag for subsequent messages
if we free the request at this point we'd reuse the tag immediately,
which definitely lead to troubles.
> What happens on server side is: requests come in sequentially, and are started
> to be processed exactly in that order. But then they are actually running in
> parallel on worker threads, dispatched back and forth between threads several
> times. And Tflush itself is really just another request. So there is no
> guarantee that the response order corresponds to the order of requests
> originally sent by client, and if client sent a Tflush, it might still get a
> response to its causal, abolished "normal" request.
yes and processing flush ought to get a lock or something and look for
Looking at qemu code it does it right: processing flush find the old
request and marks it as cancelled, then it waits for the request to
finish (and possibly get discarded) during which (pdu_complete) it'll
wake the flush up; so spurrious replies of a tag after flush should not