Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_IMX_LCDIF should depend on ARCH_MXC

From: Marek Vasut
Date: Mon Jul 11 2022 - 07:18:48 EST

Next message: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fixed __debug_virt_addr_valid()"
Previous message: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH 2/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_IMX_LCDIF should depend on ARCH_MXC"
Next in thread: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 7/11/22 11:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

The Freescale/NXP i.MX LCDIFv3 LCD controller is only present on
Freescale/NXP i.MX SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MXC, to prevent
asking the user about this driver when configuring a kernel without
Freescale/NXP i.MX support.

Fixes: 9db35bb349a0ef32 ("drm: lcdif: Add support for i.MX8MP LCDIF variant")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>

Next message: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fixed __debug_virt_addr_valid()"
Previous message: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "[PATCH 2/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_IMX_LCDIF should depend on ARCH_MXC"
Next in thread: Marek Vasut: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: mxsfb: DRM_MXSFB should depend on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]