Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: it6505: Modified power sequence

From: Robert Foss
Date: Tue Jul 12 2022 - 04:07:58 EST


Hi Allen,

On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 10:06, allen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: allen chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Change power sequence to meet it6505 data sheet requirement when boot on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pin-Yen Lin <treapking@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Chen <allen.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> index 2d119e3016b3..aa5e0aa1af85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> @@ -3029,7 +3029,7 @@ static int it6505_init_pdata(struct it6505 *it6505)
> return PTR_ERR(pdata->ovdd);
> }
>
> - pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + pdata->gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);

Making this change is problematic since it requires a corresponding
change in all of the device trees that use this device. It's against
policy to change this interface after it has been introduced.

Unless anyone thinks otherwise, I would like to see this patch dropped.

> if (IS_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset)) {
> dev_err(dev, "gpiod_reset gpio not found");
> return PTR_ERR(pdata->gpiod_reset);
> --
> 2.25.1
>