Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: Handle sram regulator probe deferral

[Viresh Kumar]

On 13-07-22, 13:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> If the regulator_get_optional() call for the SRAM regulator returns
> a probe deferral, we must bail out and retry probing later: failing
> to do this will produce unstabilities on platforms requiring the
> handling for this regulator.
> 
> Fixes: ffa7bdf7f344 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index 3a2be4552020..7f2680bc9a0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -439,9 +439,13 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
>  
>  	/* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */
>  	info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram");
> -	if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg))
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(info->sram_reg);
> +		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			goto out_free_resources;
> +
>  		info->sram_reg = NULL;
> -	else {
> +	} else {
>  		ret = regulator_enable(info->sram_reg);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_warn(cpu_dev, "cpu%d: failed to enable vsram\n", cpu);

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh